13.05.2015 Q&A
Here it is:
- IS-4 armor is correct (some players are complaining that the driver's hatch is nerfed compared to pre-HD IS-4)， same goes for allegedly broken IS-4 mantlet;
IS-4的装甲是正确的(有玩家抱怨驾驶员舱盖比以前容易击穿了)，传言中很容易击毁的IS-4炮盾的装甲也是正确的
- Storm states that the amount of mistakes WG makes with HD models is acceptable: "one mistake per patch which is found in the test and fixed";
Storm表示WG在高清化时犯的错误数量可以接受：“每个版本都能在测试中找到bug并修复”
- Storm doesn't consider the fucked models (T-62A, flying M55 turret etc。) terrible - "such mistakes happen all the time, for one reason or another. It's nothing that terrible, we will find and fix them."
Storm并不觉得那些搞砸的模型(62A炮盾、5355悬浮炮塔等)很完蛋——“这种错误一直都有，有着各种各样的原因。这不是啥完蛋的事，我们会找到并修复的”
看戏：
Some RU players complained about Super Pershing mantlet and claimed Storm confirmed a mantlet bug while Storm denied it at first. They got Storm mad:
有毛熊抱怨超潘的炮盾，谴责Storm先信誓旦旦地说没bug之后却又承认bug。这让Storm很不爽：
Storm: "Writing shit is funny and interesting. My 'answer' was written BEFORE this test."
Storm：“写sh1t什么的很有意思嘛？我的“回复”可是在测试之前就写了。”
Player: "Only poorly educated people swear."
毛熊：“只有没受过教育的家伙才会这样信誓旦旦。”
Storm: "Fuck off"
Storm：“******”
Player: "Storm, go fuck yourself."
毛熊：“Storm，******你自己去吧”
Storm: "Right back at you."
Storm：“在你后面******”
Later on, he however confirmed in another thread that the Super Pershing mantlet is indeed bugged - in 9.7, the mantlet is way too thick and too difficult to penetrate. However, considering the Super Pershing is a premium tank, WG will likely leave the mantlet bugged (much thicker than it's supposed to be) since they don't want to nerf the armor in 0.9.8. Developers have not yet decided about the correct solution。
过了一阵，Storm还是承认了超潘的炮盾确实有bug——在9.7中，炮盾太厚了，难以击穿。但是，考虑到超潘是金币车，既然不想在9.8中nerf装甲，也许WG会保留这个bug(比预期中厚了不少)。开发者们还没决定最终方案
- It's possible that the IS-3 armor doesn't correspond to the drawings because it's based on real life vehicle measurements. If mistakes are found, it's possible there will be fixes。
有可能IS-3的装甲并不合图纸，因为这是基于真实的战车测量的。如果有错误，再改就是了
来源：网络
